ေနၾကတ္ျခင္းႏွင့္ငလွ်င္လႈပ္ျခင္း ဆက္စပ္မႈရွိ/မရွိ သီအိုရီအေပၚ သံုးသပ္ရႈျမင္ျခင္းမ်ား

Britton LaRoche ၏ ၂ဝဝ၉ ခုႏွစ္ ဇူလိုင္လ ၂၂ ရက္ေန႕တြင္ ေနၾကတ္ျခင္းႏွင့္ ငလွ်င္ႀကီးမ်ားလႈပ္ကာ ဆူနာမီလွဳိင္းႀကီးမ်ားပါ ေနာက္ဆက္တြဲ  က်ေရာက္လာႏိုင္သည္ ဟူသည့္ သီအိုရီအေပၚ ေနာက္ဆက္တြဲသံုးသပ္ခ်က္မ်ား ထပ္မံေပၚထြက္လာသျဖင့္ တိုက္ရိုက္ ျပန္လည္ ေဖၚျပလိုက္ရပါသည္၊ အခ်ိန္မမီေတာ့သျဖင့္ ဘာသာျပန္ဆိုေပးျခင္း မျပဳလုပ္ေတာ့ပါ –

ဇူလိုင္လ ၁၇ ရက္ေန႕တြင္ Ronaldo Corsino မွ Britton LaRoche ၏ Blog-Post တြင္ ေအာက္ပါအတိုင္း သံုးသပ္ေရးသားခဲ့ပါသည္ –

This information is thought provoking but I cannot ignore the possibility of the author’s theory in this prediction – that is if the earth’s plate would react aggressively in the coming eclipse. The position of the author in sharing his own studies/research to the public is not a rumor to ignore but a warning to be prepared of. The complex structure of the earth, the neigbhoring planets and the whole of the universe is still mystery for us. Its transformation I believe would take place mainly because of its relativity to the other. We know that gravitational pull causes weather changes, tidal level changes and possibly tectonic plate movements. I pray that the earthquake must not big enough to cause a tsunami.

ဇူလိုင္လ ၁၈ ရက္ေန႕တြင္ ဂ်ပန္ႏိုင္ငံ Fussa ေလတပ္အေျခစိုက္စခန္းမွ အေမရိကန္ ေလတပ္တပ္ဖြဲ႕ဝင္ Jason Ring ကလည္း ေအာက္ပါအတိုင္း ေရးသားခဲ့ပါသည္ –

07/18/2009 (1:57 pm)
Evening Mr LaRoche. My name is Jason and I serve on active duty in the USAF. My family and I are currently stationed at an AF installation in Fussa, Tokyo (Kanto Plains). During a recent phone conversation with my parents, they talked about the 22 Jul 09 eclipse in addition to the discussions going on about the possibility of a sizable earth quake in Japan. So, I jumped on my favorite search engine “Google” to find out more, which is how I ran across your page. I’m no scientist or computer engineer, by any stretch of the imagination, and have a “dated” familiarity regarding the topics of plate tectonics and astronomy with my college studies (dating myself back to ’98). I’ve read through your articles and links to try and learn more about this topic to help “educate” myself on something which may or may not impact my family.

For what it’s worth, I do appreciate your research and discussions on this. You’re comment on post #14 (“..If people do take precaution on July 22nd and it saves lives then I’ll be very happy. On the other hand if things get out of hand and it causes chaos and confusion then I’ll be very upset, that is not my intent..”) caught my attention and I, for one, find you to be doing this for genuine reasons. For that, you have my thanks and attention.

Whether this event occurs or not, your research and advocacy on this have led me to take some steps to prepare (ie getting canned food, water, extra baby food & diapers, etc.) my family and I for next week.. not get my family in “chaos” mode or try to spread chaos. Hopefully, the 22nd to the 28th will be “uneventful”, but should something occur know that your “activities” helped prepare a family or two out here :).

Kind regards.
Jason

07/18/2009 (10:28 pm)
Ohayou gozaimas LaRoche-san! For what it is worth, what you are doing is scientifically based (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method). You don’t have to be a “scientist”, branded or tagged, to use the scientific method. I agree whole heartedly that the scientists in the career field or specialties have the training and qualifications to “officially” speak, per se, on matters yet anyone and everyone should be a participant in using the scientific principles and developing “theories” in whatever en devours they pursue. You’re following these principles and have developed a theory that, coincidentally, is shared by scientists.

If your tool proves a useful tool, then it is my hope that it is used as a model to emulate. If it doesn’t, then it is my hope that your efforts will help in the search and development of such a tool that would give warning to those who may be in danger from a natural disaster. As meteorologists have developed tools to aid in the identification and tracking of thunder storms, tornadoes, hurricanes, cyclones, etc., (same can be said for volcanoes) it’s my hope that a tool may one day be found to accurately identify earthquakes. I hope that your efforts with this endeavor and theory, whether it’s proved or dis-proved, will be received for what it is. A theory generated by an inquiring mind using the scientific method as their guide.
Thanks again.
Very respectfully.
Jason

==========

Donley

07/18/2009 (9:39 pm)

I second, third, or fourth the respect to you for what you have shown to the masses. I have ZERO qualifications, yet, have been promoting this theory for months! Not only that, but, I joined this community PURELY because I saw your information. I play NO games. Just wanted to talk with you.
Everything you say makes sense. I think, however, that this one will affect a wider portion of the planet.
I’ve been paying particularly close attention to the seismic actions of North America for the last few months, having nothing to do with science. Just feelings.
Could the forces you speak of not so profoundly affect the opposite side of the planet so as to influence activity here? Even a quick glance at the current USGS sites will tell you that activity here is at a peak.
My guess is that the major event you speak of will coincide with a major North American event.
Cheers,
Don

============

သူတို႕ ေရးသားခဲ့သည္မ်ားမွ အတိုခ်ဳပ္၍ ေကာက္ႏွဳတ္ေဖၚျပရမည္ဆိုလွ်င္ Britton LaRoche ၏ ေျမငလွ်င္ႏွင့္ ေနၾကတ္ျခင္းဆိုင္ရာ စမ္းသပ္မႈသည္ သီအိုရီသက္သက္မွ်သာျဖစ္ေသာ္လည္း ဤသီအိုရီ မွန္/မမွန္ကို ျငင္းဆိုႏိုင္ျခင္း မရွိပါ။ သိပၸံပညာရွင္အခ်ိဳ႕သည္ အလားတူ သီအိုရီမ်ဳိး စမ္းသပ္ခဲ့ၾကေသာ္လည္း ေျမငလွ်င္ႏွင့္ပတ္သက္သည့္ ႀကိဳတင္ခန္႕မွန္းခ်က္မ်ဳိးတြင္ ေအာင္ျမင္စြာ သက္ေသျပႏိုင္ျခင္းလည္း မရွိခဲ့ၾကေသးပါ။ သို႕ေသာ္ ဘာမွ ျဖစ္ႏိုင္မည္မဟုတ္ပါဟူ၍လည္း မည္သည့္ သိပၸံပညာရွင္ကမွ အတိအက် ျငင္းဆိုထားျခင္းမရွိပါ။

ေျမငလွ်င္လႈပ္ခတ္ျခင္းကို ႀကိဳတင္ခန္႕မွန္း၍မရႏိုင္ပါ ဟူသည့္ မူကို လက္ကိုင္ထားေနၾကေသာ သိပၸံပညာရွင္ အမ်ားစုက ႀကိဳတင္ခန္႕မွန္းႏိုင္မည့္နည္းလမ္းကိုကား ရွာေဖြစမ္းသပ္ျခင္းမျပဳၾကဘဲ ရွိၾကသည္ ဟု Jason က အျပစ္တင္ထားသည္ကိုေတြ႕ရပါသည္။

လူအမ်ားအတြက္ ႀကိဳတင္ခန္႕မွန္းေပးျခင္းျဖင့္ သဘာဝေဘးအႏၱရာယ္၏ရန္မွ ေရွာင္ရွားႏိုင္ၾကေစရန္ ရည္ရြယ္ခ်က္ျဖင့္ သူ၏တီထြင္စမ္းသပ္မႈကို သူ၏ BLOG POST ျဖင့္ ေဖၚျပအသိေပးျခင္းသည္ ေကာလဟလ ဟု မေခၚဆိုႏိုင္ပါ ဟုလည္းေရးသားထားၾကသည္ကို ဖတ္ရႈႏိုင္ပါသည္။

ထို႕ျပင္ ျပည္သူလူထုမွ စိုးရိမ္ထိတ္လန္႕ျခင္းမ်ားျဖစ္ရမည့္အစား သဘာဝေဘးအႏၱရာယ္ျဖစ္လာႏိုင္သည့္အတြက္ လိုအပ္ေသာ ႀကိဳတင္ျပင္ဆင္မႈမ်ား – အစာေရစာ ႀကိဳတင္ ဝယ္ယူစုေဆာင္းထားျခင္း၊ ေျမငလွ်င္လႈပ္လွ်င္ ေဆာင္ရန္/ေရွာင္ရန္မ်ားကို ႀကိဳတင္ သိရွိေအာင္ ေလ့လာထားျခင္း ၊ အနည္းဆံုး သတိရွိရွိ ေနထိုင္ၾကရန္ – အမႈမဲ့အမွတ္မဲ့ မေနၾကရန္ စသည္ျဖင့္ သတိတရားလက္ကိုင္ထားလာၾကမည္ျဖစ္ပါသည္။

Britton LaRoche ၏ စမ္းသပ္တင္ျပမႈသီအိုရီ မွန္ကန္ေၾကာင္း သက္ေသျပႏိုင္လွ်င္ ေနာင္အနာဂတ္၌ ေျမငလွ်င္ႀကီးမ်ားလႈပ္ခတ္မႈႏွင့္ ဆက္စပ္ျဖစ္ေပၚလာႏိုင္ေသာ ဆူနာမီလွဳိင္းႀကီးမ်ား၏ အႏၱရာယ္ကို ပိုမိုတိက်စြာခန္႕မွန္းႏိုင္ေသာ ကြန္ပ်ဴတာ Simulator မ်ား ေပၚေပါက္လာႏိုင္ပါသည္။ ၄င္း၏စမ္းသပ္တင္ျပေသာ သီအိုရီ မွန္ကန္မႈမရွိလွ်င္လည္း သိပၸံပညာရွင္မ်ားႏွင့္ ကြန္ပ်ဴတာပညာရွင္မ်ားပူးေပါင္း၍ သဘာဝေဘးအႏၱရာယ္မ်ားကို ႀကိဳတင္ေထာက္လွမ္းႏိုင္ေသာ ကြန္ပ်ဴတာ simulator နည္းပညာမ်ားကို အသံုးျပဳႏိုင္သည့္ေခတ္တစ္ေခတ္ မၾကာမီေပၚေပါက္လာေတာ့မည္ဟု ယံုၾကည္ပါေၾကာင္း တင္ျပလိုက္ရပါသည္။